<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss1full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.asha.org/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">

<channel rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org">
<title>American Journal of Audiology recent issues</title>
<link>http://aja.asha.org</link>
<description>American Journal of Audiology RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:eIssn>1558-9137</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>American Journal of Audiology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1059-0889</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/full/20/2/83?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/84?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/90?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/100?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/123?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/132?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/140?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/151?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/159?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/171?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S181?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S197?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S203?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S220?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S233?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S241?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/9?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/19?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/33?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/42?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/48?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/61?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/69?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/full/19/2/85?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/86?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/91?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/100?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/109?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/S126?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/139?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/142?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://aja.asha.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rdf+xml" href="http://feeds.asha.org/AJARecentIssues" /><feedburner:info uri="ajarecentissues" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /></channel>
<image rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>American Journal of Audiology</title>
<url>http://aja.asha.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://aja.asha.org</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/full/20/2/83?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In Appreciation [From the Editor]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/KP-mjAJ0p5Q/83</link>
<description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/KP-mjAJ0p5Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pratt, S. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/ed-02)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:aja;20/2/83</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In Appreciation [From the Editor]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>From the Editor</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>83</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/full/20/2/83?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/84?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Survey of Audiologic Service Provision to Older Adults With Cochlear Implants [Clinical Focus]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/RoiaxYGw8qk/84</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This study examined whether audiologists modify practice patterns in their provision of cochlear implant (CI) services to older adults and, if so, whether the nature of such modifications is consistent across clinical sites.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An online survey was sent to audiologists at CI centers across the United States. Questions addressed demographics, candidacy, programming, outcomes assessment, rehabilitation, and professional development.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Responses were obtained from 47 audiologists who provided CI services to older adults. The majority of these audiologists did not report modifying CI practice patterns on the basis of age. Counseling appeared to be an exception: Audiologists reported that both the content and delivery of information were modified for older adults. Specific to CI candidacy with older adults, under half of the respondents indicated that assessing an older adult's cognitive status was part of their clinical protocol.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusion&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The audiologists who responded to the survey acknowledged issues related to aging when providing CI services to older adults. Despite this acknowledgment, the results of the survey suggest a gap in how age-related issues are incorporated into CI service provision. Continued discussion as to how CI services can be optimized for older adults is needed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/RoiaxYGw8qk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rossi-Katz, J., Arehart, K. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0044)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0044</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Survey of Audiologic Service Provision to Older Adults With Cochlear Implants [Clinical Focus]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Focus</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>84</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>89</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/84?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/90?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is Measured Hearing Aid Benefit Affected by Seeing Baseline Outcome Questionnaire Responses? [Research Article]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/mV8F6DVwQos/90</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To determine whether hearing aid outcome measured by the Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI) for the Elderly/Adults (&lt;cross-ref type="bib" refid="B21"&gt;Newman, Weinstein, Jacobson, &amp;amp; Hug, 1990&lt;/cross-ref&gt;; &lt;cross-ref type="bib" refid="B31"&gt;Ventry &amp;amp; Weinstein, 1982&lt;/cross-ref&gt;) is differentially affected by informed vs. blind administration of the postfitting questionnaire.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Participants completed the HHI at their hearing aid evaluation and again at their hearing aid follow-up visit. At follow-up, half received a clean HHI form (blind administration), whereas the remainder responded on their original form (informed administration) and could thus base their follow-up responses on those they gave at the hearing aid evaluation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The data show that for the population examined here, informed administration of the follow-up HHI did not yield a different outcome to blind administration of the follow-up HHI. This was not influenced by past hearing aid use, age of the participant, or the duration of time between baseline questionnaire completion and follow-up completion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusion&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These data suggest that completion of follow-up questionnaires in either informed or blind format will have little impact on HHI responses, most likely because of the many other factors that combined to influence hearing aid outcome.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/mV8F6DVwQos" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silverman, S., Cates, M., Saunders, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0003)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0003</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is Measured Hearing Aid Benefit Affected by Seeing Baseline Outcome Questionnaire Responses? [Research Article]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>90</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>99</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/90?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/100?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of the Screening Test for Hearing Problems [Research Article]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/MLHgasWU0Z8/100</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The goal of this study was to develop a brief self-assessment instrument to screen for communication problems and psychosocial adjustment to hearing impairment as part of a rehabilitative needs assessment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A pseudorandom sample of 1,000 cases was drawn from a large, heterogeneous clinical database containing audiometric data and responses to the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired (CPHI; &lt;cross-ref type="bib" refid="B11"&gt;Erdman &amp;amp; Demorest, 1998a&lt;/cross-ref&gt;). Item response theory was used to derive item-characteristic curves, and item selection was based primarily on item discrimination. Internal consistency, factor structure, sensitivity, and specificity of 2 scales, Communication and Adjustment, were evaluated in a holdout sample of 319 cases from the same database.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A 9-item Communication scale and an 11-item Adjustment scale both showed satisfactory internal consistency, and the 20-item test presented a clear 2-factor structure. Sensitivity and specificity functions and positive and negative predictive values indicated that the 2 scales could be used to identify the bottom 2 quartiles of the clinical population, as defined by factor scores on the CPHI.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusion&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 2 scales of the Screening Test for Hearing Problems can be used to screen for communication and adjustment problems that warrant a comprehensive rehabilitative assessment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/MLHgasWU0Z8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Demorest, M. E., Wark, D. J., Erdman, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0048)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:aja;20/2/100</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of the Screening Test for Hearing Problems [Research Article]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>110</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/100?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ear Asymmetries and Asymmetric Directional Microphone Hearing Aid Fittings [Research Article]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/cVi3jaqLLkg/111</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To determine whether an asymmetry between ears for speech understanding in noise was related to performance with, or preference for, 1 of 2 asymmetric microphone fittings in which omnidirectional processing was provided to 1 ear and directional processing to the other.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Twenty-eight adults with symmetric sensorineural hearing impairment were recruited from the clinic population. Sixteen individuals had symmetric hearing-in-noise ability between their right and left ears, and 12 participants had an asymmetry for speech understanding in noise between ears. A repeated measures design was used. Interactions between various microphone fittings and speech signal locations in noise were assessed in the laboratory. In addition, the listeners with asymmetry between ears for hearing in noise completed a field trial comparing the 2 fittings in everyday listening situations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Laboratory testing resulted in different patterns of performance for the 2 groups. Field trial results revealed that participants generally noticed little difference between the 2 fittings in everyday life and did not express a strong preference for 1 fitting over the other.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusion&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An asymmetry between ears for speech understanding in noise did not result in preference for 1 asymmetric fitting over the other in everyday listening situations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/cVi3jaqLLkg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cord, M. T., Surr, R. K., Walden, B. E., Dittberner, A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0035)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0035</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ear Asymmetries and Asymmetric Directional Microphone Hearing Aid Fittings [Research Article]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>122</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/111?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/123?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Early Hearing Detection and Intervention: Diagnostic Hearing Assessment Practices [Research Article]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/jtaTE5sSG0k/123</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To gain an understanding of practice patterns for infant diagnostic hearing services at pediatric audiology facilities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors used a cross-sectional survey design. From August to November of 2009, surveys were mailed to 1,091 facilities in 28 states and the District of Columbia. One survey was completed per facility, and responses were anonymous.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The return rate was 33% (356 surveys). The results revealed that the comprehensiveness of the test batteries used varied among facilities. Over half of the respondents, 146 (55%), reported using a limited test battery, 94 facilities reported using a comprehensive test battery but lacked at least 1 component recommended by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, and 25 facilities reported using a test battery that met Joint Committee on Infant Hearing recommendations. The wait time for an appointment varied between facilities (range = 3 days&amp;ndash;5 months) and was affected by the test condition (i.e., natural sleep, sedation, or operating room).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The results suggest that it is difficult for stakeholders to identify pediatric audiology facilities that serve infants less than 6 months of age and that there is variability among facilities in test batteries and wait times for an appointment. Implications exist for diagnostic accuracy and timeliness of diagnosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/jtaTE5sSG0k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munoz, K., Nelson, L., Goldgewicht, N., Odell, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0046)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0046</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Early Hearing Detection and Intervention: Diagnostic Hearing Assessment Practices [Research Article]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>123</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>131</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/123?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/132?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of Co-Occurring Birth Defects on the Timing of Newborn Hearing Screening and Diagnosis [Research Article]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/pGXQ9mwB8qY/132</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Early detection of hearing loss in all newborns and timely intervention are critical to children's cognitive, verbal, behavioral, and social development. The initiation of appropriate early intervention services before 6 months of age can prevent or reduce negative developmental consequences. The purpose of this study was to assess, using large, population-based registries, the effect of co-occurring birth defects (CBDs) on the timing and overall rate of hearing screening and diagnosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors linked statewide data from newborn hearing screenings, a birth defects registry, and birth certificates to assess the timeliness of newborn hearing screening and diagnosis of hearing loss (HL) for infants with and without CBDs in 485 children with confirmed HL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nearly one third (31.5%) of children with HL had 1 or more CBDs. The presence of CBDs prolonged the time of the initial infant hearing screening, which contributed to further delays in the subsequent diagnosis of HL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Better coordination of HL assessment into treatment plans for children with CBDs may enable earlier diagnosis of HL and provide opportunities for intervention that will affect long-term developmental outcomes for these children.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/pGXQ9mwB8qY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chapman, D. A., Stampfel, C. C., Bodurtha, J. N., Dodson, K. M., Pandya, A., Lynch, K. B., Kirby, R. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0049)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0049</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of Co-Occurring Birth Defects on the Timing of Newborn Hearing Screening and Diagnosis [Research Article]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>132</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>139</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/132?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/140?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of Transient Noise Reduction Algorithms on Speech Intelligibility and Ratings of Hearing Aid Users [Research Article]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/7tS4QY5IBaY/140</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The goal of this study was to assess the functional utility of transient noise reduction (TNR) algorithms available in hearing aids via speech intelligibility and user preferences.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two pairs of hearing aids, 1 pair each from Siemens and Unitron, were programmed for 17 hearing impaired individuals after a hearing evaluation. Intelligibility was measured for each participant for sentences presented in quiet, with 2 types of transient noise, multitalker babble, and in a combination of each type of transient noise and multitalker babble. Each condition was tested with TNR activated and TNR deactivated in a counterbalanced, single-blinded format. Subjective ratings of overall speech understanding, comfort, and sound quality were obtained for each condition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A significant improvement in speech intelligibility was measured with the TNR activated when speech was presented in multitalker babble, in the presence of chair clang transient noises, and when combining these noises. Activation of the TNR algorithm did not result in significant improvements for any of the subjective ratings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While improvements were limited to certain conditions, specifically those with the chair clang transient and/or multitalker babble, TNR appears to offer an incremental step in improving the listening experience for hearing aid users.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/7tS4QY5IBaY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DiGiovanni, J. J., Davlin, E. A., Nagaraj, N. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0007)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0007</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of Transient Noise Reduction Algorithms on Speech Intelligibility and Ratings of Hearing Aid Users [Research Article]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>140</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>150</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/140?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/151?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gabapentin for Tinnitus: A Systematic Review [Review]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/etcsTiMNoO4/151</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The main aim of this study was to assess the effect of gabapentin on tinnitus via a systematic review.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An electronic search of literature as well as a hand search were conducted. Only double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met all of the inclusion criteria were included in this review. The Cochrane Collaboration tool for risk of bias assessment was used to investigate the validity of the included studies. Meta-analysis was not appropriate due to inadequate details in reporting the data in the included studies. Hence, qualitative synthesis and interpretation of the data were carried out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the review. Fourteen studies were excluded. There were substantive within-study clinical heterogeneities with regard to the baseline tinnitus handicap scores, duration of tinnitus, and severity of hearing loss in the included double-blind RCTs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusion&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors of both studies reported that gabapentin was not superior to placebo in their primary outcomes. However, following the assessment of risk of bias and within-study clinical heterogeneities, this review concludes that there is insufficient evidence regarding the effect of gabapentin on tinnitus.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/etcsTiMNoO4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aazh, H., El Refaie, A., Humphriss, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0041)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0041</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gabapentin for Tinnitus: A Systematic Review [Review]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>151</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>158</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/151?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/159?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Audiologic Management of Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder in Children: A Systematic Review of the Literature [Review]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/ciNnYF-jORw/159</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This review summarizes current evidence related to the audiologic management of children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A systematic search of the literature was conducted in 25 electronic databases (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, and ERIC) using key words such as &lt;I&gt;auditory neuropathy,&lt;/I&gt; &lt;I&gt;auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder,&lt;/I&gt; &lt;I&gt;auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony,&lt;/I&gt; and &lt;I&gt;hearing loss&lt;/I&gt;. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria by addressing 1 or more of 8 clinical questions. Studies were evaluated for methodological quality, and data regarding participant, intervention, and outcome variables are reported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fifteen of the 18 studies addressed the use of cochlear implantation, and 4 addressed conventional acoustic amplification. All participants demonstrated improved auditory performance; however, all 18 studies were considered exploratory, and many had methodological limitations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusion&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The clinical evidence related to intervention for ANSD is at a very preliminary stage. Additional research is needed to address the efficacy of acoustic amplification and cochlear implantation in children with ANSD and the impact of this disorder on developmental outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/ciNnYF-jORw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roush, P., Frymark, T., Venediktov, R., Wang, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0032)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0032</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Audiologic Management of Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder in Children: A Systematic Review of the Literature [Review]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>159</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>170</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/159?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/171?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cortical High-Gamma Responses in Auditory Processing [Tutorial]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/cZOMISl8Kys/171</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This tutorial provides an introduction to cortical auditory spectral responses, focusing on event-related activity in the high-gamma frequencies (60&amp;ndash;150 Hz), their recent emergence in neuroscience research, and potential clinical applications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Auditory high-gamma responses are described and compared with traditional cortical evoked responses, including the auditory evoked N1 response. Methods for acquiring and analyzing spectral responses, including time-frequency analyses, are discussed and contrasted with more familiar time-domain averaging approaches. Four cases are presented illustrating high-gamma response patterns associated with normal and impaired auditory processing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cortical auditory high-gamma responses may provide a useful clinical measure of auditory processing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/cZOMISl8Kys" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cervenka, M. C., Nagle, S., Boatman-Reich, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0036)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:aja;20/2/171</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cortical High-Gamma Responses in Auditory Processing [Tutorial]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Tutorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>171</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>180</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/171?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S181?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Including Service Learning in the Undergraduate Communication Sciences and Disorders Curriculum: Benefits, Challenges, and Strategies for Success [Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/llGXnEaB15g/S181</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To describe some of the benefits of service learning (SL), considerations in course development and construction, and implementation and outcomes of an SL course in the undergraduate communication sciences and disorders (CSD) program at a small, public university in northwest Washington.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A review of the literature on SL and a description of the author's experience in course development are provided on the basis of a computerized database search, library search, and discussions with the Western Washington University Center for Service Learning.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Teaching an SL course can present challenges to both faculty and students; nonetheless, incorporating SL into the undergraduate CSD curriculum is an excellent way of enriching the academic experience and improving critical-thinking skills of young students. SL provides hands-on opportunities for students to apply what they are learning in their CSD classes to real-world contexts, gain a better understanding of course content through engagement in real situations, and integrate information from a variety of courses in and outside of their major.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/llGXnEaB15g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peters, K. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0031)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:aja;20/2/S181</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Including Service Learning in the Undergraduate Communication Sciences and Disorders Curriculum: Benefits, Challenges, and Strategies for Success [Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>S181</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>S196</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S181?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S197?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Communication Connections: Service Learning and American Sign Language [Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/p4MVstW6IuY/S197</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article describes a connection between service learning and American Sign Language (ASL) instruction. The Deaf community served as communication partners for university students, enabling them to use language skills in a natural setting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rationale and implementation of pairing ASL with service learning are presented. A review of one study provides information about student perceptions of service learning, and a second study presents evidence about the development of ASL skills through a service learning experience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Service learning proved to be a valuable teaching method for ASL instruction, facilitating an increase in cultural awareness and ASL skills. Students' anecdotal evidence about service learning experiences indicated that they gained insights beyond just the improvement in language skills.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The connection between service learning and ASL instruction is advantageous because students gained cultural understanding as well as language skills. This course design could be used at other institutions where a Deaf community is accessible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/p4MVstW6IuY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reading, S., Padgett, R. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0029)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0029</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Communication Connections: Service Learning and American Sign Language [Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>S197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>S202</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S197?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S203?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Addressing Qualified Personnel Shortages for Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing With an Interdisciplinary Service Learning Program [Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/0kNP2Xih_Y8/S203</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To describe the student training benefits for speech-language pathology graduate students involved in an interdisciplinary, community-based intervention program at a Midwestern university for families of preschool children who were deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) and auditory-based spoken language users.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Auditory and Language Enriched Program was developed to provide graduate students with a clinically relevant service learning opportunity that also met some unique community needs of families in the community. Specifically, students learned to provide families with imaginative ways to expose their children who were DHH to language and literacy and nurture their natural curiosity and zest for learning.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Statistically significant improvement was noted between pre- and postintervention questionnaires of knowledge and skill related to intervention for this population by a single group of students.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An interdisciplinary service learning approach to intervention might provide opportunities for university graduate programs to address the immediate and long-term needs of families who have chosen a spoken language outcome for their young children who are DHH while simultaneously providing invaluable experience with low-incidence populations for their preservice graduate students.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/0kNP2Xih_Y8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pakulski, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/11-0005)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:aja;20/2/S203</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Addressing Qualified Personnel Shortages for Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing With an Interdisciplinary Service Learning Program [Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>S203</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>S219</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S203?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S220?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Promise of Service Learning in a Pediatric Audiology Course on Clinical Training With the Pediatric Population [Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/3DYft6-Ajmk/S220</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This study investigated the effectiveness of service learning (SL) and its impact on students' clinical competency, interest in pediatric audiology as a career, and levels of community engagement, as well as its impact on the community.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Forty-eight students enrolled in an SL pediatric audiology course providing hearing and middle ear testing to 292 children, ages 6 months to 5 years. Another 10 non-SL students served as a control group. SL surveys were administered to students before and after the SL experience and post hoc to the non-SL group to assess their perceived readiness for evaluating children and their interest in pediatric audiology. Parents and community partner staff members completed another survey to provide feedback about their experience with the SL activity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The students' ratings were higher post-SL than pre-SL, and their learning gain was positively ranked post-SL compared with the non-SL group. Also, 71% of the SL students expressed positive interest in pediatric audiology post-SL compared with 37% of the non-SL group. Responses from community partners were also positive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Embedding SL into a pediatric audiology course increased student interest in pediatric audiology as a career and enhanced readiness to evaluate young children.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/3DYft6-Ajmk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaf, W. A., Strong, E. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0022)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:aja;20/2/S220</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Promise of Service Learning in a Pediatric Audiology Course on Clinical Training With the Pediatric Population [Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>S220</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>S232</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S220?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S233?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Service Learning in Auditory Rehabilitation Courses: The University of Texas at Dallas [Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/lBmKoMC7Qe8/S233</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aim of this work was to review service learning (SL) principles and its implementation into the auditory rehabilitation (AR) curriculum at the University of Texas at Dallas and to evaluate the courses to determine whether potential benefits of SL are worth the substantial time commitment and course restructuring.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Via retrospective review, student outcomes for 25 students from 3 cohorts who completed the adult AR course prior to implementation of SL curriculum (pre-SL) were compared with those of 28 students from 3 SL cohorts. Data included final examination grades, ratings for overall course content, amount learned, clarity of responsibility, workload, relevance, and course comments. Student journals from the SL group and mentor surveys also were reviewed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The majority of student outcomes were comparable for pre-SL and SL cohorts. Clarity of responsibility and workload were rated lower for SL courses than for pre-SL classes, with medium and small to medium effect sizes, respectively. Mentors rated the projects and process of high value and benefit, and several projects remain in use beyond the end of the course.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusion&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Continued use of an SL approach is supported, but additional guidance for students is needed for reflection and project analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/lBmKoMC7Qe8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cokely, C. G., Thibodeau, L. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0050)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:aja;20/2/S233</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Service Learning in Auditory Rehabilitation Courses: The University of Texas at Dallas [Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>S233</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>S240</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S233?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S241?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of Interdisciplinary Service Learning Experience for Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology Students Working With Adults With Dementia [Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/tfRpLf7yqkM/S241</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An interdisciplinary service learning (SL) experience with audiology and speech-language pathology students was designed to examine changes in students' attitudes toward adults with dementia following an SL experience in which they socialized with nursing home residents who had dementia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nineteen audiology and 24 speech-language pathology students completed an SL course, and 14 audiology and 18 speech-language pathology students did not participate in the SL course. The students interacted with 24 nursing home residents with dementia; specifically, the audiology students conducted 2 hearing evaluations with the residents, and the speech-language pathology students socialized with the residents during 15 visits. The students' attitudes toward older adults with dementia were assessed using Kogan's Attitudes Toward Old People Scale (&lt;cross-ref type="bib" refid="B31"&gt;Kogan, 1961&lt;/cross-ref&gt;) and qualitative analysis of their journal entries. The results were compared across groups over time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SL groups showed more positive attitudes than the non-SL students, and their later journal entries were more positive than earlier entries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This SL experience provided clinical opportunities for audiology and speech-language pathology students to work with adults with dementia. Direct contact with the residents resulted in more positive attitudes toward older adults in residential facilities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/tfRpLf7yqkM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaf, W. A., Barboa, L. S., Fisher, B. J., Snavely, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-07T13:51:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0025)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0025</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of Interdisciplinary Service Learning Experience for Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology Students Working With Adults With Dementia [Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Using Service Learning to Enhance Undergraduate and Graduate Education in Audiology and Aural Rehabilitation</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>S241</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>S249</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/2/S241?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[War Injuries [From the Editor]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/OxSuH4ToGo4/1</link>
<description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/OxSuH4ToGo4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pratt, S. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T09:01:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/ed-01)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:aja;20/1/1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[War Injuries [From the Editor]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>From the Editor</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>2</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/1?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Computerized Administration and Scoring of the Dichotic Nonsense Syllable Test [Clinical Focus]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/9cBFWCf92h4/3</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A user-friendly computer program was designed to administer the dichotic nonsense syllable test (DNST). Computer automation makes it easier for listeners to perform the response task appropriately and for audiologists to administer and accurately score the test.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The program presents test stimuli in a user-controlled, self-paced sequence; provides an easy-to-use client interface to collect listener responses; verifies that appropriate responses are recorded before proceeding with the test; scores responses automatically; and stores the information in an electronic format that is easy to analyze and archive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The automated DNST protocol is described. Verification tests confirm the accuracy of stimulus sequencing, response recording, and test scoring.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Computer automation makes administering the DNST easier, ensures the accuracy of test scoring, and simplifies the analysis and archiving of results. These refinements may make the DNST more useful to clinicians. Further research is required to establish normative data for this version of the DNST.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/9cBFWCf92h4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lundeen, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T09:01:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0024)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0024</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Computerized Administration and Scoring of the Dichotic Nonsense Syllable Test [Clinical Focus]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Focus</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>8</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/3?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/9?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Services for Children With Central Auditory Processing Disorder in the Republic of Ireland: Current and Future Service Provision [Clinical Focus]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/iSMNThcggQQ/9</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An interdisciplinary research group was established to investigate current and future service provision for children with central auditory processing disorder ([C]APD) in the Republic of Ireland. The aim of Phase 1 was to identify current awareness and knowledge of (C)APD among the relevant professionals in Ireland, including level of service provision, if any, available for children with (C)APD. The aim of Phase 2 was to explore the initial steps required to develop an integrated service for children presenting with (C)APD.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A quantitative design was used in Phase 1, and 520 surveys were distributed to speech and language therapists, audiologic scientists, and educational psychologists. A qualitative participative design was used in Phase 2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There was a 53% response rate to the survey. The main findings from Phase 1 were that all professional groups considered themselves to be inadequately informed and lacking in skills for (C)APD assessment or intervention. In Phase 2, 98 participants with backgrounds in speech and language therapy, audiologic science, educational psychology, and occupational therapy engaged in interdisciplinary discussions to identify the first steps required to develop a (C)APD service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusion&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All professional groups considered that they were inadequately informed about (C)APD, and the first steps required to develop services in Ireland include the promotion and development of interdisciplinary teamwork and education, a need for additional resources, a clearer understanding of the definition of (C)APD, and evidence-based assessment and management of this condition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/iSMNThcggQQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Logue-Kennedy, M., Lyons, R., Carroll, C., Byrne, M., Dignan, E., O'Hagan, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T09:01:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0028)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0028</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Services for Children With Central Auditory Processing Disorder in the Republic of Ireland: Current and Future Service Provision [Clinical Focus]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Focus</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>18</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/9?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/19?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How "Proficient" Is Proficient? Subjective Proficiency as a Predictor of Bilingual Listeners' Recognition of English Words [Research Article]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/_XOSGcB3L2Y/19</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;English proficiency must be considered when a bilingual individual is to be evaluated clinically with English speech material. This study describes the minimum level of self-reported English proficiency that identifies bilingual individuals who may perform on par with monolingual listeners on an English word recognition test.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A total of 125 normal hearing bilingual listeners rated their English proficiency in listening, speaking, and reading on an 11-point scale. Other related linguistic variables were also obtained. A randomly selected Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 (NU-6) list (50 English monosyllabic words) was presented to all participants at 45 dB HL in quiet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over 90% of the listeners self-rated to have at least "good" proficiency in English listening, speaking, or reading. Of these participants, more than 30% did not achieve a monolingual normative level in English as delimited by binomial distribution. Composite proficiency ratings across language domains better predicted word recognition performance than self-ratings for listening proficiency only. Combining language dominance and age of English acquisition with proficiency ratings further improved prediction specificity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Self-rated English proficiency can predict bilingual listeners' performance on the NU-6 test. For desirable sensitivity and specificity in predicting monolingual-like performance, a minimum rating of 8 out of 10 across all language domains is recommended.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/_XOSGcB3L2Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shi, L.-F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T09:01:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0013)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0013</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How "Proficient" Is Proficient? Subjective Proficiency as a Predictor of Bilingual Listeners' Recognition of English Words [Research Article]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>32</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/19?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/33?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Noise-Induced Hearing Injury and Comorbidities Among Postdeployment U.S. Army Soldiers: April 2003-June 2009 [Research Article]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/8qiNOYAkfEk/33</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To evaluate noise-induced hearing injury (NIHI) and blast-related comorbidities among U.S. Army soldiers in an effort to understand the morbidity burden and future health service requirements for wounded war fighters returning from the Central Command Area of Responsibility, predominantly from Iraq and Afghanistan deployments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inpatient and outpatient records with diagnosed NIHI or blast-related comorbidities (e.g., significant threshold shift [STS], noise-induced hearing loss, tinnitus, sensorineural hearing loss, eardrum perforations, mild traumatic brain injury, and posttraumatic stress disorder) were extracted for active duty soldiers returning from combat deployments. Records were limited to those within 6 months of the soldier's return date from April 2003 through June 2009. To account for changes in STS coding practice, STS rates observed after October 1, 2006, were used to extrapolate prior probable postdeployment STS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Statistically significant increases were observed for tinnitus, dizziness, eardrum perforations, and speech-language disorders. The combination of observed and extrapolated STS yielded a conservative estimate of 27,427 cases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Estimates can be used to forecast resource requirements for hearing services among veterans. This article could serve as a guide for resourcing and innovating prevention measures and treatment in this population. Data provided may also serve as a baseline for evaluating prevention measures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/8qiNOYAkfEk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Helfer, T. M., Jordan, N. N., Lee, R. B., Pietrusiak, P., Cave, K., Schairer, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T09:01:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0033)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0033</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Noise-Induced Hearing Injury and Comorbidities Among Postdeployment U.S. Army Soldiers: April 2003-June 2009 [Research Article]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>41</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/33?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/42?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparing Pure-, Pulsed, and Warbled Tone Thresholds in Adults at 3000 and 6000 Hz [Research Article]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/gHALIuYF_aE/42</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pulsed and warbled tones are suitable substitutions for pure tones in hearing threshold measurement according to the 2005 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association guidelines. These guidelines also recommend measuring thresholds at 3000 and 6000 Hz. To date, there is no research directly supporting substitution of pulsed or warbled tones for pure tones at 3000 and 6000 Hz for listeners with normal hearing or with hearing loss. This study compared pure-, pulsed, and warbled tone thresholds at 3000 and 6000 Hz.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Forty-seven adults with normal hearing and 16 adults with sensorineural hearing loss participated in this study. Air-conduction thresholds were elicited with pure tones at octave intervals from 250 to 8000 Hz and with pure-, pulsed, and warbled tone stimuli at 3000 and 6000 Hz.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Small mean differences in thresholds were obtained using each of the 3 stimulus types for both listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss. Some of the mean differences tested were found to be statistically significant. The differences were nevertheless small and in all cases within the clinically accepted 5-dB step size.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusion&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although substitutions did not violate the 5-dB step size, the slope of a listener's hearing loss may be a factor in the inaccuracy of measurement during the substitution of warbled tones for pure tones.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/gHALIuYF_aE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Franklin, C. A., Franklin, T. C., Franklin, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T09:01:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0026)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0026</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparing Pure-, Pulsed, and Warbled Tone Thresholds in Adults at 3000 and 6000 Hz [Research Article]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>42</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>47</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/42?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/48?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Survey of the Diagnosis and Management of Auditory Processing Disorder [Research Article]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/0YzsimBuIcw/48</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A survey of audiologists' diagnosis and intervention protocols for auditory processing disorder (APD) was conducted to determine current protocols and compare results with published recommendations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A survey was distributed by mail to 515 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association audiology members who listed APD as an area of expertise and via e-mail to Educational Audiology Association members. The survey was completed by 195 audiologists.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The majority of respondents reported using auditory processing (AP) test batteries selected based on clinical experience, review of the literature, and attendance at professional conferences. The most popular tests were dichotic, monaural low-redundancy speech, and temporal processing tests. Treatment and management recommendations were usually customized for each patient based on deficits found in behavioral AP testing. The majority of respondents indicated that audiologists are responsible for APD diagnosis (97%) and recommendation of treatment/management (81%); in contrast, only 40% of respondents indicated audiologists were responsible for providing treatment/management.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Audiologists are selecting AP test batteries based on the age and case history of the patient, which is in accordance with recent national guidelines. Audiologists are primarily responsible for APD diagnosis and recommending treatment/management. APD treatment is provided by speech-language pathologists, educators, and audiologists.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/0YzsimBuIcw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emanuel, D. C., Ficca, K. N., Korczak, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T09:01:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0019)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0019</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Survey of the Diagnosis and Management of Auditory Processing Disorder [Research Article]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>48</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>60</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/48?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/61?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Influence of Receiver Size on Magnitude of Acoustic and Perceived Measures of Occlusion [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/OvcIgvd-YtE/61</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current study examined measured and perceived occlusion for a receiver-in-the-canal (RIC) hearing aid with different-sized receivers. The relationship between these measures and ear canal volume was also investigated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thirty adult participants were fitted with an RIC hearing aid and tested with 5 receiver size conditions. Measured occlusion effect was calculated from aided and unaided real-ear responses obtained while subjects vocalized /i/. Perceived occlusion measures were acquired using an occlusion effect scale.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Measured occlusion was greatest for the largest receiver. The most common perceived occlusion ratings were none to mild occlusion for all receiver sizes. Perceived ratings were weakly correlated to acoustic measures. There was little to no correlation between receiver size and estimated ear canal volume.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Measured and perceived occlusion was minor in all receiver conditions. Occlusion was not correlated to ear canal volume, suggesting that RIC hearing aids most often result in negligible amounts of measured and perceived occlusion effect, regardless of ear canal size. Because no significant relationship existed between the occlusion measures, clinicians may need to consider that self-rating of occlusion may not match measured occlusion results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/OvcIgvd-YtE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vasil-Dilaj, K. A., Cienkowski, K. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T09:01:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2010/09-0031)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2010_09-0031</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Influence of Receiver Size on Magnitude of Acoustic and Perceived Measures of Occlusion [Article]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>61</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>68</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/61?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/69?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Targeting Hearing Health Messages for Users of Personal Listening Devices [Review]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/ctpIisseZ_g/69</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To summarize the literature on patterns and risks of personal listening device (PLD) use, which is ubiquitous among teenagers and young adults. The review emphasizes risk awareness, health concerns of PLD users, inclination to take actions to prevent hearing loss from exposure to loud music, and specific instructional messages that are likely to motivate such preventive actions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We conducted a systematic, critical review of the English-language scholarly literature on the topic of PLDs and their potential effects on human hearing. We used popular database search engines to locate relevant professional journals, books, recent conference papers, and other reference sources.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adolescents and young adults appear to have somewhat different perspectives on risks to hearing posed by PLD use. Messages designed to suggest actions they might take in avoiding or reducing these risks, therefore, need to be targeted to achieve optimal outcomes. We offer specific recommendations regarding the framing and content of educational messages that are most likely to be effective in reducing the potentially harmful effects of loud music on hearing in these populations, and we note future research needs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/ctpIisseZ_g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Punch, J. L., Elfenbein, J. L., James, R. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T09:01:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0039)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2011_10-0039</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Targeting Hearing Health Messages for Users of Personal Listening Devices [Review]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>69</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>82</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/69?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/full/19/2/85?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reviewers Are Critical to the Peer Review Process [Editorial]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/2aGK7OTb0-8/85</link>
<description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/2aGK7OTb0-8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pratt, S. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-12-02T09:00:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2010/ed-02)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:aja;19/2/85</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reviewers Are Critical to the Peer Review Process [Editorial]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>85</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/full/19/2/85?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/86?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Impact of Sudden Hearing Loss Secondary to Heroin Overdose on Fitting Outcomes [Grand Rounds]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/mXh3Hus9CxY/86</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are few cases in the literature that report the auditory effects of heroin overdose. Follow-up and rehabilitation in these cases are unreported. In the case reported here, a 29-year-old woman presented with sudden bilateral sensorineural hearing loss subsequent to reported heroin overdose. She was fitted with binaural amplification and monitored over 3 months.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults&amp;mdash;Screening version (HHIA&amp;ndash;S), Expected Consequences of Hearing Aid Ownership (ECHO), and Satisfaction With Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) were administered after hearing aid fitting. These measures assessed the patient's perceptions of handicap as well as her expectations of and satisfaction with amplification.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The patient's responses on the HHIA&amp;ndash;S were higher than normative values at the time of the incident, indicating perceptions of greater handicap. Her perceptions of handicap decreased after having been fit with hearing aids. Responses on the SADL and ECHO were within normative values.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusion&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This case provides a framework for managing the rehabilitation of this population. Audiologists need to understand their role in the careful monitoring of hearing rehabilitation and how they may help in determining complaints that may be hearing- or device-related versus those associated with the psychological symptoms experienced during the withdrawal period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/mXh3Hus9CxY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nair, E. L., Cienkowski, K. M., Michaelides, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-12-02T09:00:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2010/09-0020)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2010_09-0020</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Impact of Sudden Hearing Loss Secondary to Heroin Overdose on Fitting Outcomes [Grand Rounds]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Grand Rounds</prism:section>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>86</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>90</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/86?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/91?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Animated Toys Versus Video Reinforcement in 16-24-Month-Old Children in a Clinical Setting [Research Article]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/IM2Dwm3GiPU/91</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To compare the clinical efficacy of visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) with animated toy animal reinforcement (AVRA) to the efficacy of VRA with video reinforcement (VVRA) in children age 16 to 24 months in a fast-paced medical practice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 145 participants (age 16 to 24 months) were referred by either their primary care physician or an otolaryngology practitioner (physician or nurse practitioner) for audiologic assessment. Children were assigned in a counterbalanced manner to either the AVRA or VVRA group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Significantly more threshold estimates were obtained with AVRA (&lt;I&gt;M&lt;/I&gt; = 5.52) than with VVRA (&lt;I&gt;M&lt;/I&gt; = 3.47). There were no significant differences in performance based on age, hearing status, or gender.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Number and relative strength of the visual reinforcers used are posited as the main reasons for the disparate outcomes. Clinical practices that test large numbers of children with VRA would be well-served to have both AVRA and VVRA available to meet the needs of individual patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/IM2Dwm3GiPU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karzon, R. K., Banerjee, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-12-02T09:00:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2010/10-0009)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2010_10-0009</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Animated Toys Versus Video Reinforcement in 16-24-Month-Old Children in a Clinical Setting [Research Article]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>99</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/91?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/100?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Age-Related Changes in Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials Using a Modified Blood Pressure Manometer Feedback Method [Research Article]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/3-_ClX3lbo4/100</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To collect age-specific vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) data and to characterize age-related differences in VEMP parameters using a modified blood pressure manometer (BPM) method of sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle monitoring.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Methods&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VEMPs were recorded on healthy adults ranging in age from 23 to 84 years with no history of dizziness, neuromuscular pathologies, or cervical complaints. Participants were assigned to 3 groups using a nonprobability static group assignment based on their age. VEMP P1 and N1 latency, threshold, peak-to-peak amplitude, and interamplitude difference (IAD) ratios were obtained at 130 dB SPL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Statistical differences were detected in peak-to-peak mean amplitude and threshold measures among groups. Post hoc analysis revealed that differences shown were between the young group and both older groups. No significant differences were noted in P1 and N1 latencies or IAD ratios.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This study confirmed a significant decline in VEMP amplitude and increase in VEMP thresholds in healthy older persons. Normative age-related data may be necessary to properly interpret VEMP recordings in a clinical setting when evaluating aging populations. The BPM method utilized for controlling SCM muscle may be a valuable alternative to control SCM muscle contraction when electromyography equipment is not available.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/3-_ClX3lbo4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tourtillott, B. M., Ferraro, J. A., Bani-Ahmed, A., Almquist, E., Deshpande, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-12-02T09:00:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2010/10-0021)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2010_10-0021</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Age-Related Changes in Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials Using a Modified Blood Pressure Manometer Feedback Method [Research Article]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>108</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/100?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/109?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Do Group Audiologic Rehabilitation Activities Influence Psychosocial Outcomes? [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/XUV8soyfK10/109</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To attempt to determine whether group audiologic rehabilitation (AR) content affected psychosocial outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A randomized controlled trial with at least 17 participants per group was completed. The 3 treatment groups included a communication strategies training group, a communication strategies training plus psychosocial exercise group, and an informational lecture plus psychosocial exercise group. Evaluations were conducted preclass, postclass, and 6-months postclass; they included hearing loss&amp;ndash;related and generic quality of life scales, and a class evaluation form.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All treatment groups demonstrated short- and long-term improvement on the hearing loss&amp;ndash;related quality of life scale. Minimal differences were measured across treatment groups. A significant difference was observed between the lecture plus psychosocial exercise group and the communication strategies training group for 1 hearing loss&amp;ndash;related quality of life subscale. Better outcomes were measured for the 2 groups with psychosocial exercises versus the communication strategies training group on 1 generic quality of life subscale. The results for the class evaluation did not discriminate among the treatment groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Class content had only a minimal influence on treatment outcomes. Recommended AR class content includes a mix of interventions including information, training, and psychosocial exercises.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/XUV8soyfK10" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Preminger, J. E., Yoo, J. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-12-02T09:00:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2010/09-0027)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2010_09-0027</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Do Group Audiologic Rehabilitation Activities Influence Psychosocial Outcomes? [Article]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>109</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>125</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/109?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/S126?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Selective Annotated Bibliography for Clinical Audiology (1989-2009): Books [Supplement]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/eyiDreutYho/S126</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the 2nd in a series of 3 planned companion articles that present a selected, annotated, and indexed bibliography of clinical audiology publications from 1989 through 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Research and preparation of the bibliography were based on published guidelines, professional audiology experience, and professional librarian experience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first article in the series covered reference works. This article focuses on other books. The planned third companion article will present periodicals and online resources.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Audiologists and librarians can use this bibliography to help them identify relevant clinical audiology literature.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/eyiDreutYho" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferrer-Vinent, S. T., Ferrer-Vinent, I. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-12-02T09:00:58-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2010/10-0001)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:aja;1059-0889_2010_10-0001</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Selective Annotated Bibliography for Clinical Audiology (1989-2009): Books [Supplement]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Supplement</prism:section>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>S126</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>S138</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/S126?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/139?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Room Modes With Regard to Speech Intelligibility in Classrooms: Comments on Knecht et al. (2002) [Letter to the Editor]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/CV2QMfS19T0/139</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To comment on the article "Background Noise Levels and Reverberation Times in Unoccupied Classrooms: Predictions and Measurements" by &lt;cross-ref type="bib" refid="B4"&gt;Knecht, Nelson, Whitelaw, and Feth (2002)&lt;/cross-ref&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Schroeder frequencies to determine the transition from individual resonances to many overlapping normal modes are calculated and discussed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Schroeder frequencies ranged from 67 Hz to 141 Hz.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Knecht et al. could have validly measured reverberation time at 250 Hz in all classrooms and at 125 Hz in the majority of classrooms because, above the Schroeder frequency, measurement of reverberation time is not significantly affected by room modes. Furthermore, Knecht et al. selected 5 different positions in each classroom for measurement of reverberation time, but in small volumes more measurement positions must be selected due to the effects of room modes compared with large volumes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/CV2QMfS19T0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shalkouhi, P. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-12-02T09:00:58-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2010/09-0023)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:aja;19/2/139</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Room Modes With Regard to Speech Intelligibility in Classrooms: Comments on Knecht et al. (2002) [Letter to the Editor]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter to the Editor</prism:section>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>139</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>141</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/139?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/142?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Room Modes With Regard to Speech Intelligibility in Classrooms: Response to Shalkouhi (2010) [Letter to the Editor]]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.asha.org/~r/AJARecentIssues/~3/WAkWGKfLIZg/142</link>
<description>&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Purpose&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To respond to comments by &lt;cross-ref type="bib" refid="B4"&gt;Shalkouhi (2010)&lt;/cross-ref&gt; on the article "Background Noise Levels and Reverberation Times in Unoccupied Classrooms: Predictions and Measurements" by &lt;cross-ref type="bib" refid="B2"&gt;Knecht, Nelson, Whitelaw, and Feth (2002)&lt;/cross-ref&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Method&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Schroeder frequencies calculated by &lt;cross-ref type="bib" refid="B4"&gt;Shalkouhi (2010)&lt;/cross-ref&gt; were compared with the octave-band weighting factors used by &lt;cross-ref type="bib" refid="B5"&gt;Steeneken and Houtgast (1980)&lt;/cross-ref&gt; in their calculation of the Speech Transmission Index.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To assess the potential impact of invalid reverberation times measured at 125 Hz on speech understanding in the classrooms, we note that the weight given to the octave band at 125 Hz is 0.0.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;
&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since the octave band of background noise centered on 125 Hz has no impact on speech understanding, we suggest that reverberation time measures at 125 Hz are unnecessary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AJARecentIssues/~4/WAkWGKfLIZg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Feth, L. L., Nelson, P. B., Godfrey, R. D., Whitelaw, G. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-12-02T09:00:58-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2010/10-0017)</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:aja;19/2/142</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Room Modes With Regard to Speech Intelligibility in Classrooms: Response to Shalkouhi (2010) [Letter to the Editor]]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter to the Editor</prism:section>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>142</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>142</prism:endingPage>
<feedburner:origLink>http://aja.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/142?rss=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
</rdf:RDF>

